Lincoln MKS

Name: 2016 Lincoln MKS
Brand: Lincoln

EPA MPG: 21 mpg

Owner Reported MPG:

EPA MPG: 21 mpg

Owner Reported MPG:

Reliability Details

Owner Satisfaction Details

See All Ratings & Specs

Road Test

Until the reborn Lincoln Continental goes on sale, the MKS is Ford's luxury division's largest sedan. Despite various updates over the years, the MKS is outdated and outclassed. It has plenty of luxury features but they can't cover up fundamental flaws, including a cramped driving position and cave-like visibility. Handling is ungainly, the ride is neither isolating enough nor adequately composed, and the powerful 3.7-liter engine is coarse. A twin-turbocharged V6 improves refinement and adds more power, but doesn't turn the MKS into a luxury sports sedan.

2016 Sedans & Hatchbacks Reliability

This Car

100

0 - 100

Lincoln MKS

vs. Similar Cars

Audi A6

BMW 5 Series

Buick LaCrosse

Lexus ES

Mercedes-Benz E-C...

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

See All Models Reliability

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Poor

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Poor

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

Lincoln vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Owner Reports

Owner Satisfaction Owner Satisfaction

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Driving Experience

Comfort

Value

Lincoln vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Lincoln vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Poor

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

2016 Luxury midsized cars Ratings

2016 Lincoln MKS

$9,425 - $11,325

EPA MPG 21 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Acura RLX

$10,625 - $13,500

EPA MPG 24 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Audi A6

$8,000 - $16,050

EPA MPG 22 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Audi A7

$13,200 - $15,825

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Audi S4

$14,950 - $15,575

EPA MPG 21 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 BMW 5 Series

$10,775 - $15,725

EPA MPG 23 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 BMW 6 Series

$13,550 - $19,675

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Buick LaCrosse

$6,200 - $13,125

EPA MPG 29 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Cadillac CT6

$10,875 - $17,250

EPA MPG 22 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Cadillac CTS

$7,575 - $40,175

EPA MPG 22 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Cadillac XTS

$9,900 - $13,475

EPA MPG 21 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Chevrolet SS

$32,750

EPA MPG 16 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Infiniti Q70

$11,600 - $15,725

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Jaguar XF

$6,575 - $9,875

EPA MPG 23 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Lexus ES

$16,800 - $17,500

EPA MPG 24 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Lexus ES Hybrid

$17,500

EPA MPG 40 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Lexus GS

$15,125 - $30,825

EPA MPG 23 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Lincoln MKZ

$6,275 - $11,575

EPA MPG 26 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Maserati Ghibli

$8,650 - $12,275

EPA MPG 18 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS

$15,075 - $25,925

EPA MPG 20 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

$11,500 - $30,000

EPA MPG 24 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volvo S80

$8,875 - $9,825

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volvo V60

$7,075 - $16,175

EPA MPG 23 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volvo XC70

$8,975 - $13,925

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

See All Luxury midsized cars Ratings

Features & Specs

sedan

2 front, 3 rear

AWD, Front

3.5-liter V6 turbo (365 hp)
3.7-liter V6 (304 hp)

6-speed automatic

In most cases, automotive warranties are based on the vehicle identification number (VIN), and the warranty will be valid regardless of ownership. The dealership can tell you exactly how much warranty is left.

Read more about extended warranties

See All Ratings & Specs

Model History

2013-2016

2013 Redesign Year

The MKS feels out of step with the automaker's more impressive, recent models. This large, Ford Taurus-based sedan is powered by a choice of thrashy, unrefined 3.7-liter V6 or a potent 3.5-liter twin-turbo V6. For its size, the cabin feels decidedly cave-like, exaggerated by the limited outward visibility. The ride-something a luxury car should be good at-is neither isolating enough nor adequately composed. The infotainment system makes a notable update to Sync 3 for 2016. Despite the trunk's size, a small opening limits its usefulness. The outdated and outclassed MKS was replaced by the stylish, all-new Continental in 2017.

2009-2012

2009 Redesign Year

This sedan debuted in 2009, with a 3.7-liter V6 that provides good power but isn't particularly refined. In lieu of a V8, a turbocharged V6 is available, as is all-wheel-drive. The ride is comfortable, but not always settled. Handling is secure, but lacks agility and none of the three suspension settings are ideal. The interior is roomy, but the driving position and footwell are narrow. Despite nice interior materials, details come up short. A short opening limits the usefulness of the otherwise huge trunk, and a high rear deck restricts rear visibility. More recent models gained the MyLincoln Touch infotainment system, which is convoluted and frustrating to use.