GREEN CHOICE

Hyundai Elantra

Name: 2016 Hyundai Elantra
Brand: Hyundai

EPA MPG: 31 mpg

Owner Reported MPG:

EPA MPG: 31 mpg

Owner Reported MPG:

RECALL ALERT: There is 1 recall on this vehicle. Learn More.

There is 1 recall on this vehicle. Learn More.

RECALL ALERT: There is 1 recall on this vehicle. Learn More.

There is 1 recall on this vehicle. Learn More.

Reliability Details

Owner Satisfaction Details

See All Ratings & Specs

Road Test

The Elantra is a well-rounded competitor that ranks near the top of our small-sedan Ratings and out-points strong competitors such as the Ford Focus and Honda Civic. Easy to live with, the Elantra combines nimble handling with a comfortable, well-controlled ride and a neatly laid out, well-equipped interior. Coupe-like styling, with a beltline that swoops up toward the rear, can impede the view to the rear quarters. The 148-hp, four-cylinder engine delivers solid performance and very good fuel economy. The cabin is well finished and the rear seat is relatively roomy. Road noise is rather pronounced. While the Elantra coupe is simply a two-door version of the high-scoring sedan, the Elantra GT hatchback is a noticably different car that scores significantly lower in our ratings.

2016 Sedans & Hatchbacks Reliability

This Car

100

0 - 100

Hyundai Elantra

vs. Similar Cars

Chevrolet Cruze

Ford C-MAX

Honda Civic

Honda Fit

Mazda 3

See All Models Reliability

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Acceptable

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Acceptable

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

Hyundai vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Owner Reports

Owner Satisfaction Owner Satisfaction

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Driving Experience

Comfort

Value

View all Owner Satisfaction

Hyundai vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Hyundai vs. Other New Car Brands

See How All Brands Stack up

Crash Tests

IIHS Front Moderate Overlap

Good

IIHS Front Small Overlap, Driver

Acceptable

IIHS Side Crash

Good

NHTSA Overall Crash

NHTSA Overall Frontal-Crash

NHTSA Overall Side-Crash

See All Ratings & Specs

2016 Small sedans/hatchbacks Ratings

2016 Hyundai Elantra

$6,225 - $7,925

EPA MPG 31 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Chevrolet Cruze

$5,200 - $7,400

EPA MPG 34 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Chevrolet Sonic

$4,575 - $6,850

EPA MPG 29 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Chevrolet Spark

$5,475 - $5,725

EPA MPG 35 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Chevrolet Volt

$7,000 - $9,025

53 miles

42 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Dodge Dart

$5,300 - $7,775

EPA MPG 27 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Fiat 500L

$4,250 - $6,925

EPA MPG 27 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Ford C-MAX

$7,950 - $8,775

EPA MPG 39 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Honda Civic

$10,000 - $13,375

EPA MPG 35 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Honda Fit

$9,125 - $10,700

EPA MPG 34 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Hyundai Accent

$5,625 - $5,925

EPA MPG 31 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Hyundai Elantra GT

$ NA

EPA MPG 27 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Kia Forte

$5,900 - $8,675

EPA MPG 29 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Kia Rio

$5,325 - $6,775

EPA MPG 31 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Mazda 3

$7,800 - $11,300

EPA MPG 33 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

$5,925 - $8,375

EPA MPG 25 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Mitsubishi Mirage

$ NA

EPA MPG 40 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Nissan Sentra

$5,150 - $6,250

EPA MPG 32 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Nissan Versa

$4,450 - $5,650

EPA MPG 33 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Nissan Versa Note

$4,425 - $5,650

EPA MPG 34 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Scion iA

$8,400

EPA MPG 37 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Scion iM

$9,950

EPA MPG 31 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Subaru Impreza

$7,350 - $11,175

EPA MPG 30 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Toyota Corolla

$9,100 - $11,050

EPA MPG 32 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Toyota Prius

$12,675

EPA MPG 52 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Toyota Prius C

$9,625 - $10,550

EPA MPG 50 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Toyota Prius V

$12,600

EPA MPG 42 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Toyota Yaris

$6,800 - $9,725

EPA MPG 32 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volkswagen Golf

$6,225 - $16,775

EPA MPG 29 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen

$ NA

EPA MPG NA

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

2016 Volkswagen Jetta

$6,525 - $11,250

EPA MPG 32 mpg

Road test

Reliability

Owner Satisfaction

See All Small sedans/hatchbacks Ratings

Features & Specs

4-door hatchback

sedan

2 front, 3 rear

Front

1.8-liter 4 (145 hp)
2-liter 4 (166 hp)
2-liter 4 (173 hp)

6-speed automatic
6-speed manual

In most cases, automotive warranties are based on the vehicle identification number (VIN), and the warranty will be valid regardless of ownership. The dealership can tell you exactly how much warranty is left.

Read more about extended warranties

See All Ratings & Specs

Model History

2021-Present

Current Generation

The redesigned for 2021 Elantra got a slightly roomier interior and a more sophisticated infotainment system. The standard engine is a 147-hp four-cylinder teamed with a continuously variable transmission, which together give quick acceleration and commendable fuel economy for the compact class. A hybrid powertrain is available and got an impressive 48 mpg overall in our tests. Handling is nimble but the ride is a bit stiff and the engine can get noisy. Seat comfort is so-so unless buyers get the uplevel Limited trim, and the low stance makes access a bit awkward. The infotainment system is easy to use and features wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity with the 8-inch touch screen. FCW, AEB with pedestrian detection, BSW, and RCTW are standard. A high-performance 276-hp turbo N is new for 2022.

2017-2020

2017 Redesign Year

The redesigned Elantra is relatively roomy, sparing with fuel, and features intuitive controls. The 2.0-liter four-cylinder returned an excellent 33 mpg overall in our tests but delivers leisurely acceleration and buzzes unpleasantly as revs increase. The Eco version feels more responsive but comes at a $3,000 price premium. Although handling is secure, there isn't much driving excitement. The ride is mostly unobjectionable, but sharp bumps tend to come through noticeably. Road noise is elevated as well. Inside, the front seats in our tested SE are short on lumbar support, though the power seat in the Limited is better. Active safety features and a Sport version with a 1.6-liter turbo four-cylinder are available.
For 2020, the Elantra got a freshening that included suspension tweaks that improved ride comfort, and more sound insulation which reduced engine noise. The six-speed automatic has been replaced by a continuously variable transmission (CVT). In addition, all trims come standard with forward collision warning, city speed automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and lane keeping assist.

2011-2016

2011 Redesign Year

Between the 2011 and 2015 the Elantra was one of the more stylish compact sedans. The car was well-equipped for the price. It was also fuel efficient with 29 mpg overall. Handling is nimble and secure and the ride is reasonably comfortable. Road noise, however, is pronounced. The interior is relatively roomy with a decent rear seat, but the low stance and curvy roofline make access a bit challenging. Controls are very well laid out and easy to use and Bluetooth connectivity for phone and music is built-in for most versions. Hatchback models have added cargo utility but have a tighter back seat, a stiffer ride and are noisier.

2007-2010

2007 Redesign Year

Although relatively competitive against its peers at the time, the 2007 to 2010 Elantra was a basic transportation, nothing more nothing less. If you're considering buying one, make sure it's from 2008 or later with optional stability control, which came only on SE versions. Side crash test results, as performed by the IIHS, were marginal. Lacking agility, the car is boring to drive. High points included a relatively roomy interior and easy to use controls. Acceleration is rather leisurely and the engine gets noisy when revved. On the other hand, the ride was compliant enough and not too noisy. Fuel economy of 27 mpg overall was decent for that vintage.

2001-2006

2001 Redesign Year

We suggest you stay away from this vintage of the Elantra. The car scored poorly in the IIHS front offset crash test. Anti-lock brakes were optional but hard to find. Also, the car is from an era when cars weren't designed to provide protection in side crashes. That alone should deter you. If it doesn't, the car achieved 25 mpg overall in our testing, the rear seat was relatively roomy and controls are user friendly.

1996-2000

1996 Redesign Year

Hyundai introduced the small Elantra in 1992, a step up from the uninspired Hyundai Excel. It needed several more steps to be a competitive sedan. The car handled well enough on smooth roads, but the suspension crashed and banged on bumps that other cars took in stride. The front seats were pretty good. The Elantra was redesigned for 1996; a wagon was added to the lineup. The underpinnings were up to date and the interior was well equipped, but ride comfort and engine smoothness both needed improvement. It received a 2.0-liter Four for 1999.