Consumer Reports has developed a new crash test that offers consumers comparative performance information on which car seats could provide an additional margin of safety when compared with other models within the same ratings group that have been subjected to the same test protocol. Our Crash Protection Ratings are based on injury criteria measured on standardized child-size dummies, contact of the dummy’s head with the back of a simulated front seat and a car seat’s ability to remain intact during the course of testing. Consumer Reports’ new crash tests are not designed to check whether a seat complies with current federal car seat safety standards. Rather, the purpose of our new tests is to differentiate the seats’ performance on a scale that ranks the performance of tested seats ranging from “basic” to “best.” Our focus on providing an “extra margin” of safety, rather than on determining whether a seat is safe or not, is based on the fact that any car seat sold in the U.S. already must provide an essential level of safety under the government standards. The new test conditions were carefully designed to simulate the interior environment and forces encountered during a crash in contemporary vehicles. Changes from the way that convertible seats were rated previously include using a test bench that better simulates the vehicle seat design from a contemporary vehicle, with more representative cushion stiffness and seat geometry and incorporation of a “blocker” to simulate a front seatback. The new test also runs at a higher 35mph speed, with other representative dynamic characteristics that better simulate the behavior of contemporary vehicles during a crash.
As part of Consumer Reports’ car seat evaluation program, CR conducts its own simulated frontal crash tests. In 2 of 2 rear-facing tests with the CRABI 12-month-old dummy installed with lower anchors, there was significant cracking in the shell from the rear to front. In 1 of 1 rear-facing tests with the CRABI 12-month-old dummy installed with the 3pt belt, there was cracking from the rear of the shell to near the crotch buckle slots.
In 1 of 1 rear-facing tests with the Hybrid III 3-year-old installed with the 3pt belt, there was significant cracking in the shell from the rear to front, along with cracking down the middle of the seat. The Hybrid III 3-year-old was not tested rear-facing with lower anchors because of the 12-month CRABI results. While both the dummy and the CRS stay retained post-test, there is concern that the seat should not have such large cracking with the smallest dummy size (12-month CRABI) that it is intended for.